A coalition of independent publishers has lodged an antitrust complaint with the European Commission, accusing Alphabet’s Google of abusing its dominant search position by using their material to power its AI Overviews without offering an opt‑out.
The group also seeks an interim injunction, warning that continued use would inflict irreversible damage to their readership and revenues. The complaints against Google are not unique, as earlier this year, the UK’s competition watchdog launched an investigation into the search engine giant’s dominance in search and search advertising.
AI integration by Google has sparked publisher concerns.
Google’s AI Overviews automatically generate summaries that appear above traditional search links and are shown to more than a hundred countries. Since May of last year, these snippets have even included advertisements, marking Google’s most significant push to weave AI into its core search service. But, some content providers argue that this feature unfairly diminishes traffic to their own sites.
According to a June 30 filing seen by Julisha Media, the Independent Publishers Alliance contends that Google’s practice “misuses web content for AI Overviews,” causing “significant harm to publishers, including losses in traffic, readership and revenue.”
They claim the placement of AI summaries at the very top of search results sidelines the original articles, effectively steering users away from the publishers themselves.
“Google’s core search engine service is misusing web content for Google’s AI Overviews in Google Search, which have caused, and continue to cause, significant harm to publishers, including news publishers in the form of traffic, readership and revenue loss.” reads the filing in part.
The complaint underscores that publishers have no way to stop Google’s large language models from scraping their work, yet if they try to block crawling, they also forfeit their presence in ordinary search listings.
“Publishers using Google Search do not have the option to opt out from their material being ingested… without losing their ability to appear in Google’s general search results page,” it states.
The Alliance is not alone. The Movement for an Open Web, a collective of digital advertisers and publishers, and the UK-based legal charity Foxglove have joined the suit, urging both Brussels and London’s Competition and Markets Authority to impose urgent restraints to prevent further damage and ensure access to news.
This adds to the growing conflict between AI and journalism.
Neither the European Commission nor the UK CMA would comment on ongoing filings. Google, for its part, insists it drives “billions of clicks to websites each day” and that its new AI features help users find content and businesses.
A spokesperson told the media that: “New AI experiences in Search enable people to ask even more questions, which creates new opportunities for content and businesses to be discovered.”
Google also dismissed claims about declining traffic as based on “incomplete and skewed data,” pointing out that fluctuations can stem from seasonality, changing user interests, or standard algorithm tweaks.
“The reality is that sites can gain and lose traffic for a variety of reasons, including seasonal demand, interests of users, and regular algorithmic updates to Search,” said the spokesperson.
Foxglove co‑executive director Rosa Curling warned that independent news outlets face an “existential threat” from AI Overviews.
“That’s why with this complaint, Foxglove and our partners are urging the European Commission, along with other regulators around the world, to take a stand and allow independent journalism to opt out.”
Similar legal action has already been launched in the United States, where an educational technology firm argues that Google’s summaries undermine demand for original content, sapping visitor numbers and subscriber growth.
As both sides prepare for what could become landmark antitrust determinations, it remains to be seen if Google can continue to bolster its AI-driven search innovations without trampling on the livelihoods of the very publishers whose content fuels its algorithms.